Showing posts with label BG Accepted. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BG Accepted. Show all posts

Monday, 27 October 2008

Fajarowicz Gambit

Before I continue my blogs on the Budapest I am going to briefly mention the Fajarowicz Gambit - an off-shoot of the Budapest Gambit (and not one I am brave enough to play).

History
The first known recorded game of the Fajarowicz Gambit (or Fajarowicz-Richter System) was between Herman Steiner and Sammi Fajarowicz (chapter 8, game #) in Wiesbaden, 1928.

The result of the game was a loss for the German Champion, Fajarowicz, though a promising position had been reached. It is worth noting that Fajarowicz died at the age of 32 and the theory progressed through Kurt Richter, a German International Master, who preferred this line to the standard Budapest Gambit.

Over the years the opening has declined in popularity, as the complex and dynamic theory behind the opening has not been studied deeply enough for continuous play by any one Grandmaster. Though, the opening has been employed at the highest level in recent years by Grandmasters more as a surprise defence or attack!

The Initial Position
The opening of the FG begins when the following position arises:

This is most commonly reached through the moves 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5 3.dxe5 Ne4.

It is worth examining this position to see the relative merits of the position, as we did with the BG.

Firstly, we will look at this from White’s perspective.

White has a good square for his Queen’s Knight on f3, tucked behind the pawn on f4 which he will be looking to support with the light-square Bishop. The Black Knight on e4 restricts White’s pawns from advancing. White will be looking to castle Kingside with this opening, though there is still development to be done before this. But most pressing is the Knight on e4 and whether to attack this piece or develop naturally. In the Queen’s Gambit white is expecting to exchange the pawn on the c-file rather than the centre pawn on the d-file and many players who choose the Queen’s Gambit for its slow development and safe lines can get into an uncomfortable position, even this early into the game.

Black’s analysis can be done in the same way.

Black is looking to castle Kingside, though in many FG games the King castles Queenside to allow his Kingside pawns to advance up the board and help in the attack. Black seeks to get his Queen on the open file once the Bishop is out in the open. The Queen’s Knight develops naturally and d6 will open the lines for the Queen’s Bishop. The Pawn move d5 is usual in the FG to support the Knight on e4 and control central squares. The Knight on e4 is Black’s most aggressive piece and is hard to ignore.

It is early on and much can happen, but it is often useful to take 2 minutes at each step to see the overall plan and make sure that moves you make are both flexible and strategically sound. Connecting moves and ideas such as King Bishop out first to allow, castling, d5, Queen on the open file and Queen Bishop out allow plans to flow naturally.

It is now up to White to decide on whether to attack the Knight or develop naturally (best).

I'm going to leave the Fajarowicz there, whilst I have learnt more about this opening I think, at least at this stage, it is best not to "muddy the waters" with this line.

Thursday, 16 October 2008

Game 1 – Alder – Maróczy, 1896

Before I start delving into the strategy, motives and tactics of the Budapest Gambit I think a quick look at the Gambit's first ever game is in order. Oh, and it's a victory for the Gambit too!


Alder – Maróczy, Budapest, 1896

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5 3.dxe5 Ng4 4.Nf3 Bc5 5.e3
The standard opening of the Budapest Gambit accepted with the Knight defence. This opening allows Black to place strong and immediate pressure on f2, forcing 5.e3 White’s only response (5.Nd4?? Nxf2! 6.Kxf2 Qh4+ 7.g3 Qxd4+ 8.Qxd4 [8.Ke1 Qf2+ 9.Kd2 b5 ] Bxd4+ or 5.Be3 Bxe3 6.fxe3 Nxe3 7.Qd3 Nxf1 )


5…Nc6 6.Qd5?!
Defending the pawn with the Queen is a bad idea here and better is 6.Be2 or Nc3 giving the pawn back, but relieving pressure.
6…Qe7
Attacking the pawn a third time, which now cannot be saved.


7.Nc3 Ngxe5 8.Be2
White is preparing to castle Kingside.
8…d6
Black is leaving the option open to castle either way and is opening the diagonal for his light-square Bishop.
9.Ne4?
This is a mistake by White. The attack on the Black Bishop is met by a counterattack with greater compulsion.
9…Be6
This move both develops the Bishop and attacks the Black Queen.


10.Qd1 Bb4+
(10.Qd1 or Qd2 [both equal] Bxc4 11.Nxc5 Bxe2 12.Nxe5 Qxe5 13.Qxe2 dxc5 Black has a pawn advantage, is better developed and an overwhelming attack on the Queenside).

11.Bd2 0-0-0
The Bxc4 capture is still viable on move 11, but Black chooses to castle and get his King safe an option which White doesn’t have time to take.

12.Bxb4 Nxb4 13.Qb3 Nxf3+ 14.Bxf3?
Almost inevitably the pressure becomes too much and White blunders. Here, 14.gxf3 d5! 15.a3 Nc6 is better.


14…d5! 15.Nd2 dxc4 16.Nxc4 Rd3
Removing the Knight’s defender.


17.Qa4 Bxc4 18.Qxa7??
18.0-0 is best, but even this is delaying the inevitable. This leaves mate in two.
18…Nc2+
0-1
It is mate next move with either 19.Ke2 Rd5# or 19.Kf1 Rd1#


I hope you found this primitive game interesting. Many of the ideas of the Budapest Gambit are see in this game, though refined over time. It's always useful to have illustrative games to assist in opening theory.

Also, I do try to put a large number of boards in the blog, so that boards don't have to be used in reading these blogs, but it is good practice to have a board (physical or computer screen) to play through all the positions.